Headlines Times · 3597 East Monarch Sky Lane, Suite 240, Meridian, ID 83646
Politics · National

Federal Court: Justice Department Fired Maurene Comey Illegally

A judge ordered the reinstatement of the former prosecutor and $40,000 in back pay, ruling that her termination violated constitutional checks on executive power.

By Chinedu Schneider ·

Illustration for: Federal Court: Justice Department Fired Maurene Comey Illegally
Illustration generated for this article, not a news photograph.

Federal judges have long served as a check on executive branch power, a principle now formally applied to a high-profile dismissal in New York. On Monday, U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman ruled that Maurene Comey, the daughter of former FBI Director James Comey, was unlawfully terminated by the Justice Department.

The court ordered Comey’s reinstatement and awarded back pay from her July 2025 firing through December 20, 2025. The total award covers approximately $40,000 in lost wages. Furman determined that the Justice Department’s decision to remove Comey violated the separation of powers and her Fifth Amendment right to due process. The ruling specifically rejected the administration’s argument that career prosecutors can be fired at will without cause.

Maurene Comey served as an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York for nearly a decade. During that time, she worked on the prosecutions of Sean Combs, former Senator Bob Menendez, and Jeffrey Epstein. Her attorneys, including Ellen Blain and Margaret Donovan, stated that the decision reaffirms that the President is not above the law. They noted that the victory belongs to all civil servants who fight for the rule of law.

The Justice Department disputed the findings. A spokesperson for the department said it disagrees with the decision and will appeal in due course. In court filings, the department argued that then-Attorney General Pam Bondi had the authority to remove Comey without explanation. Furman found that Bondi failed to follow statutory limits on removal power, depriving Comey of due process. The judge noted that Congress imposed specific limits on the Attorney General’s removal authority, limits the government conceded were violated.

The legal battle began in September 2025 when Comey sued the administration. Her complaint alleged that the firing stemmed from President Donald Trump’s long-standing dispute with her father, who was fired as FBI Director in 2017. Comey stated that her supervisor told her the decision came from Washington. The administration’s position, according to Furman, relied on a sweeping theory of executive authority that flies in the face of nearly two centuries of Supreme Court precedent.

The ruling lands as the administration continues to pursue a separate criminal case against James Comey. The government contends a photo of seashells sent to Trump amounted to a threat. That case has been delayed until at least early 2027 while a judge weighs whether to dismiss it. James Comey’s legal team argues the case is a product of retribution rather than good-faith law enforcement.

Source: NBC News

More Politics · Report a business

Get Headlines Times in your inboxReporting on the stories people talk about. Free, a few times a week, unsubscribe any time.

Related stories

Get Headlines Times in your inboxReporting on the stories people talk about. Free, a few times a week, unsubscribe any time.